The
C5 conceived
Clive Sinclair
recalls that it was as a teenager with a holiday job at the electronics
instrument company Solatron that he first started to enquire into electric
vehicles. They would be silent and pollution-free, and he was fascinated with
that possibility. However, the received wisdom was that electric vehicles were
slow and cumbersome (because of all those batteries) - not to mention
unreliable.
Early motor cars had
generally emerged as an existing design of horse-drawn vehicle fitted with an
internal combustion engine - and were they not called "horseless
carriages"? Electric vehicle design was going the same way; now the
internal combustion engine chassis was being used as a base, fitted with
batteries and an electric motor. Sinclair thought that the proper approach must
be to start from scratch (what we now call ground-up design - nothing to do with
pulverising) rather than to tinker with an existing model (top-down design).
Sinclair pondered
long on the personal electric vehicle, and in the early 1970s he had Chris Curry
working on the problem at St Ives Mill. At that time, he thought that it was the
motor wherein the secret lay, and they worked on a wafer-thin model which was
mounted on a scooter; if you stood on the platform with one foot, and pushed
yourself off with the other as you pressed a button on the handlebars you could
glide up and down the lab. However, it was at about this time that the pocket
calculator became all-consuming, and although Sinclair continued to talk about
electric vehicles, he sponsored no further work on them until the end of the
1970s.
Tony Wood Rogers on prototype chassis
In the 1970s, as the
world became more conscious of the problems of pollution and the need to
conserve energy, governments - and government bodies such as the Electricity
Council in Britain - made funds available for sponsoring development work on
electric vehicles. Some £5.5M was contributed in the decade, notably £2.3M to
Lucas for the Lucas/Vauxhall delivery van, £1.9M to Chloride Silent Power for
the sodium/sulphur battery and £0.5M to Lucas again for the nickel/zinc
battery.
With the interest
shown by the government in electric vehicle research, it is not surprising that
all those manufacturers who had been working on electric vehicles, Lucas
prominent among them, found a sympathetic ear for their parliamentary lobbying;
a working party was set up and eventually the electrically-assisted pedal cycle
legislation was passed in August 1983. By that time, the companies in the
automotive industry who had been pressing for the new laws had all felt a change
for the worse in the industrial climate and were hardly in a position to pursue
the topic.
It was about
Christmas 1979 that Sinclair approached Tony Wood Rogers, with whom he had kept
in touch since he had worked at Sinclair Radionics in the early 1970s. Rogers
preferred to live in the West Country, and was now running the Exeter Academy.
Sinclair asked him if he would like to act as a consultant on the electric
vehicle project, and briefed him to "perform and present a preliminary
investigation into a personal electric vehicle. The vehicle is assumed to carry
one person (with a possible second small person only by squeezing), and is seen
as a replacement for a moped and limited to urban use with a top speed of 30
mph."
They expected to
launch the vehicle early in 1984, and were even then thinking in terms of
100,000 vehicles manufactured annually. A vehicle to this specification later
became known as the C1. At the time, this was seen as the only way to get into
the electric vehicle field; later, when Rogers tuned in to the new legislation,
the specification changed to what we now know as the C5 (C for Clive and 5 for
five).
Together, Sinclair
and Rogers examined different vehicle layouts, and Rogers built prototypes to
prove principles rather than to develop a product. During 1980, the
specification of the vehicle became clearer. It was to carry the housewife, the
urban commuter or the youngster; its advantages over the moped would be that it
offered greater safety, weather protection, economy - and style - at a
competitive target price of £500, based on the likely cost of such a vehicle
vis-à-vis the competition: the moped and the second car. It would be designed to
be easy to drive, easy to park, easy to get into and out of, and easy to load.
It would need minimum maintenance and would provide maximum power efficiency for
minimum battery size. For urban performance, it should have a minimum range of
30 miles on a fully charged battery, which could be extended by means of an
additional battery. Batteries would last for two years. It would be designed and
engineered for simple, high-volume assembly using injection-moulded plastic
components where possible and a polypropylene body.
Iain Sinclair with prototypes
On 26 March 1980, the
Government abolished motor tax for electric vehicles. Department of Transport
figures for 1978 showed that there were 17.6M licensed vehicles in the UK,
including 14M cars and 1.2M mopeds and motorcycles. 2.4M households had a second
car.
There were 175,000
electric vehicles in use, of which 45,000 were road-going: 90 per cent of them
milk floats. Then the very telling information - 93
per cent of all cars travel less than 60 miles per day; the average daily
distance per car is 13 miles; virtually all journeys by pedal cycle and moped
are less than six miles.
The Transport and
Road Research Laboratory (TRRL) gave comparative figures for primary energy
consumption of vehicles in the following ratios - lead-acid electric vehicle
(111): petrol car (100): diesel vehicle (55). However, continued the report, for
urban driving the electric vehicle is twice as efficient as the petrol car, and
better electric vehicles and batteries will further improve its efficiency.
There were clear
advantages for electric vehicles. During the day they would provide an
environmentally acceptable method of transport, and when the batteries were
being charged (normally during the night) they would be using off-peak power. We
have already seen that the British government sponsored £5.5M of electric
vehicle research in the ten-year period ending in 1983; by contrast the US
government allocated £71.5M for the ten-year period ending in 1986. Although
there was a great deal of interest in promoting electric vehicles, the
submissions to the government committees concentrated on public and commercial
transport and made no mention of personal transport.
By March 1982 the
first Sinclair vehicle, the C1, had reached quite an advanced stage. Innumerable
calculations had been carried out on power efficiency, and the engineering of
the battery motor and drive was largely complete. Tony Wood Rogers had built and
tested a number of chassis, the later ones using components from preferred
suppliers. One of the fundamental factors which had been realised from an early
stage was the need to reduce drag on the body as much as possible.
It is a widely
believed fallacy in the motor industry that below 20mph wind resistance doesn't
matter. The truth is that wind resistance matters hugely, as any cyclist will
tell you. It just seems to matter less with a car because there is so much
rolling resistance at low speeds, but it is none the less significant if you are
trying to conserve energy. If the rolling resistance of a motor car were as low
as that of a bicycle, manufacturers would soon be putting their body shells into
wind tunnels to study the effects of low-speed drag.
An early embodiment
The body shape and
basic layout of the C1 body was tested in the wind tunnel at Exeter University;
Rogers made full-size fibre-glass shells and fitted them to working chassis. He
also surveyed all the regulations that might affect electric vehicles, paying
particular attention to safety. Part of the ground-up approach was not to spend
- as other investigators had done - enormous amounts trying to develop a more
efficient battery, but to make use of the models already available. Sinclair's
very sound reasoning was that a successful electric vehicle would provide the
necessary push to battery manufacturers to pursue their own developments in the
fullness of time; for him to sponsor this work would be misplacement of funds.
There was, however, a need for a battery which would stand up well to the
continuous charge-discharge cycle, and this he was obviously prepared to
investigate.
So far, all this
development work had been carried out under the umbrella of Sinclair Research
Ltd, but when the project seemed to have a future, Sinclair saw that the cost of
failure would be comparable with the reward of success. Moreover, he saw that it
would need a very large sum to develop the vehicle, to tool up for production,
and to launch it. He therefore decided to sell some of his shares in Sinclair
Research in order to raise capital to invest in the electric vehicle programme
as a separate company - Sinclair Vehicles Ltd. The deal - described in Chapter
12 - was completed in March 1983, leaving him the richer by £12M.
Sinclair and Rogers
now decided that the most important thing to do next was to have the vehicle
body professionally styled, and the project was handed over to Ogle Design in
Letchworth, well known in the motor industry. For about a year, Ogle worked on
the project considering not only the styling but also the production
engineering. But although their methods of working were admirably suited to the
car industry, they were not used to working with the likes of Clive Sinclair and
Tony Wood Rogers. They spent a lot of time and money on aerodynamic tests, where
Sinclair and Rogers preferred the quick estimate first and a detailed analysis
later if it seemed to be profitable. Ogle did not appreciate that they were
designing a personal electric vehicle rather than a car, and instead of building
on the cycle technology and looking at ways of reducing the rolling resistance,
they veered towards car design and increased the weight from less than 100kg to
over 150kg. Sinclair and Rogers became increasingly worried.
Sinclair's search for
someone to run Sinclair Vehicles finally led to his meeting Barrie Wills. Wills
had taken part in building a factory for Leyland National in the late 1960s to
manufacture the first bus to be built on car-assembly principles. He joined
Reliant in 1972 when that company was at a crossroads investing a lot of money
in a new product, again an almost greenfield project. He was De Lorlean's
longest serving employee and is saddened that the De Lorean will go down in
history as a failure, when it was so nearly a phenomenal success.
In October 1982, a
mutual friend asked Wills if he was interested in meeting Clive Sinclair to talk
about his electric vehicle enterprise. He replied that of course he would like
to meet Clive Sinclair, but that he was not in the slightest bit interested in
electric cars; one thing that 25 years in the motor industry had taught him - he
thought - was that there was never going to be an electric car. But when he met
Sinclair and found he was doing something entirely original, based on sound
principles and the ground-up approach, he was immediately won over. This was the
time that the crossroads had been reached with Ogle Design, and Wills took part
in assessing their work. He had always believed - and Sinclair didn't need
persuading - that there was little future in any personal electric vehicle which
could not compete with the price of a second hand car. It was lack of
appreciation of this, he thought, that had so far bedevilled electric vehicle
development.
The chassis clothed
By the time Wills
joined Sinclair in March 1983, they had decided to put the Ogle programme on
ice; it was somewhat ironic that the new managing director of Sinclair Vehicles
should have been party to a decision which meant that he had joined the company
without a product. But there was another factor which made the decision to
freeze the Ogle work less painful. Sinclair and Rogers had now become aware of
the impending legislation which would introduce a new category of vehicle - the
electrically assisted pedal cycle. They saw that everything which had prevented
the electric moped from competing with the conventional moped (the road tax, the
insurance, the helmet, the driving licence) would be eradicated at a stroke: the
only less-favourable aspect was the reduction of maximum legal speed to 15mph.
The closer they
looked at the draft legislation, the more apparent it became that a tremendous
amount of the development work that they had already done could be applied to a
new vehicle: unique, exciting, attractive, stylish - and, they thought,
marketable. They took as the basis of their new design the recumbent cycle with
two wheels at the rear for stability, and thus was the C5 born.
Legislation had given
Sinclair's electric vehicle development a new impetus; he could now see the C5
as his first shot at opening - once again - a market that did not exist. He
would use the C5 to attune people to the idea of electric vehicles - to prove
that they were a viable proposition - so that he could carry on "to the end
of the century and beyond" introducing more and more advanced models.
The new legislation
had been written so that vehicle designers would have as much freedom as
possible; notwithstanding this, the design that Sinclair Vehicles produced was a
complete surprise to the Department of Transport. The regulations to be met by
law are fairly short and simple. The cycle - as it's called technically - has to
weigh no more than 60kg including the battery; as it was, the design of the C5
was so honed that it was possible to fit
two batteries without exceeding the 60kg weight limit. The motor must not be
rated at more than 250W. The vehicle has to meet British Standard regulations
for cycle braking. It has to have an on/off switch biased towards off, it has to
have a plate stating who the manufacturer is, and it has to be
"electrically assisted", so it must have pedals. It can be ridden
(driven) by anyone over the age of 14, with no licence, no insurance, and no
crash helmet.
It was about this
time that Sinclair was looking very closely at Lotus cars, assisted by Wills who
had known the company for 15 years or so. For some time, they talked of the
possibility of Sinclair buying into Lotus, but he eventually decided that it was
not going to be the best way forward either for Lotus or for Sinclair Vehicles
and the project was abandoned. But when Wills had been at Reliant he had
developed a good relationship with Lotus; he and Sinclair therefore decided to
place a development contract with Lotus to take the basic C5 design, finish the
detailing, build the prototype and the test rigs, develop the vehicle, devise
and execute the test programmes, and generally assist the project from its
design and development stages into production.
Brian Spooner was the
product manager at Lotus. Initially, he was sceptical about the whole project;
even seeing the model left him somewhat cold. However, when he got into it, and
drove it for the first time he began to warm to it, and once he started to look
at the engineering he became excited about it very quickly.
This was the common
pattern all the way through the project. Although the development work was kept
extremely secret - and the fact that Lotus was involved never seemed to have
leaked out until the launch of the C5 - a number of sub-contractors and
suppliers had to be shown the vehicle. And their reaction to it almost always
followed the same course: first disinterest, then scepticism, and then - after a
ride on a prototype - wild enthusiasm.
Lotus's first task
was to examine the model and produce a package of proposals of what they would
do. Down in Exeter, Rogers was doing some more work in the wind tunnel and
further reduced the drag factor from 0.95 to 0.6. Throughout the project, the
relative positions of the seat, pedals and steering remained much the same;
however, to avoid the need for an adjustable design - which would mean extra
cost - they worked on a layout which would allow a range of people from a
relatively slight 14 year old girl to a notably tall man to sit in the machine
and pedal it in comfort. This work was completed in 1983 and Lotus then went on
to detail design, development, and testing of the vehicle. A great deal -
perhaps a quarter - of the work went into examining the legal and safety
aspects; Lotus took all the British standards that apply to cycles, and where
they applied to the C5 ensured that it behaved as well as, if not better than,
the stated requirements.
The C5 met the
Ministry of Transport regulations in every way. The regulations were, of course,
aimed at encouraging manufacturers to produce an electric vehicle, perhaps an
unusually far-sighted approach. Those from the Ministry responsible for drafting
the regulations went to look at the C5. They were incredibly impressed, but
though they admitted that it wasn't quite what they had imagined, they were
delighted and full of praise for both the vehicle and the team.
As the project
progressed, further body designs were tested in the wind tunnel and full-size
fibre glass shells were built. A number of people looked at the styling and,
although they were not happy about it, could not pinpoint exactly what ought to
be done.
It was at about this
time that Sinclair Research took on
Gus Desbarats, an engineer with a postgraduate training in industrial design. It was
he who took a completely new look at the project; within a week or so he
produced a revised styling on which the production C5 body was based. After a
new clay model had been built, refinements such as the wheel trims and the
luggage compartment were added, and there was the finished body, more or less as
it went into production.
In parallel with this
was the mechanical design, crucial to which was the chassis. Again the layout
dictated the shape to some extent and the chassis emerged as two identical metal
pressings, joined top and bottom with a closing plate at the rear. The design
was subjected to a thorough stress analysis in order to produce a light
structure which would have enough torsional flex to provide a suspension for the
vehicle - there had never been any thought of a separate suspension system.
Tony Wood Rogers had
been working on battery development, when out of the blue came a letter from one
Joe Caine, an ex-Chloride man who wrote to Sinclair saying that he'd heard about
the electric vehicle project, that he knew that the secret was to find a really
good battery, and that he (Caine) knew all about batteries, and would like to
help. Rogers went to meet Caine, took him on, and together they toured all the
battery manufacturers to appraise the joys and woes of battery production. Soon,
Caine was set up in a lab in Bolton with £10,000 worth of automatic battery
testing machine, and in conjunction with Oldham developed a battery for the C5
whose life exceeded the 300 charge-discharge cycles specified. Rogers had also
found a suitable motor - from Bosch - designed primarily to drive a truck
cooling fan, which delivered the maximum 250W output. It was left to Lotus to
design a gearbox for the C5 final drive.
The body of the C5
was made from two injection-moulded polypropylene shells; the upper shell being
one of the largest - if not the largest - injection moulding of its type in the
UK: possibly even in the world. The two parts were to be bonded by placing a
tape around the joint which can be heated with an electric current. They would
be aligned on a jig and pressed together, the current passed, and - hey, presto!
-a body shell. The process is used for manufacturing the Topper dinghy and the
BL Maestro front and rear bumper assemblies. J.J. Harvey in Manchester - one of
the UK's leading mould-makers - made the moulds, and Linpac, the UK's largest
thermoplastic moulding company, supplied the shells. ICI, who supplied the raw
material, took great interest in the project, and ran computer programmes
relating to mould flow. It was very much a team effort: a tremendous amount of
know-how went into the development and manufacture of the C5 body after its
shape had been determined. One mould set would produce up to 4000 parts per
week.
The original rear
axle design was a tube with two stub axles welded to it; when Lotus examined it
from a production engineering point of view they saw that they could draw on car
steering column practice; the rear axle thus became a tube swaged down at each
end with rolled threads and splines - a very low cost, handsome, elegant single
piece component.
Perran Newman of
MetaLab, working at "arm's length", developed the circuitry which
indicates, via green, amber and red LEDs, the state of the battery charge. As
each segment is extinguished, you know that your battery is getting lower; at
the last light, you know you have 10 minutes of driving time left and then it
will start flashing; if you don't switch off it will switch itself off and you
will have pedal power only. In the advanced model, another display acts as an
ammeter with two green segments, an amber, and two red; red for when you're
pulling a high current, showing that you really ought to be pedal-assisting the
motor. The idea is to try to keep the display green - the most economical
running mode.
The vehicle has three
systems for protecting the motor. The first is a stall system; if you draw too
much current for too long (so that the motor heats up) the electronics will
switch off and force you to wait half an hour before you can switch on again.
The second system is a thermistor probe in the end of the motor armature which
cuts off the current if the temperature rises above a certain level; it will
reconnect when the temperature drops again. The third system, if the others
fail, is a thermal trip built into the motor. The motor is therefore
super-protected against all forms of idiocy.
The fact that
Sinclair bought an option on the De Lorean assets in Northern Ireland led to
some confusion in the press. Sinclair Vehicles had been set up to develop a
range of models over a period of time, starting with the C5 as the most basic
and leading on to others which would become more and more car-like. Now, one of
the attractions of the De Lorean plant was that it had one of the most
well-developed automated plastic body manufacturing facilities in Europe, or
even in the world. This facility could have been of use in possible Sinclair
Vehicles developments; the option was on some of the assets within the factory -
indeed, Sinclair Vehicles would not have to use the factory at all; it could buy
the assets and move them elsewhere if it wished. Talks lasted for about a year,
but there was mounting pressure from the receiver wanting does to dispose of De
Lorean's assets and, so Sinclair relinquished the option and the plant went to
auction.

Barrie Wills testing to destruction
From the very start
of the project, Wills's approach had been to document everything so that the
reason for every decision was on file. On a cycle, the law calls for lights or a
reflector - the C5 incorporates both; it has the normal lighting system
built-in, with an additional reflector which forms the top half of the lamp.
There is reflective tape around the body and on the wheels. The rear light
incorporates a central rear lamp and reflectors. The kit as originally planned
included a reflector pole to increase the height of the vehicle by two feet with
a white reflector at the front and a red one at the rear - the decision to make
increased visibility an extra would be one of the pieces in the jigsaw of the
C5's disappointment. The vehicle was put through an extremely rigorous test
schedule - the chain, the pedals, the effect of impact.
It would have been extremely adverse publicity if a fatal accident were to occur through the C5 not having been properly tested. Anyone who might conceivably have been concerned with safety was consulted, and Sinclair Vehicles "took full note of all the recommendations which might improve the safety of the vehicle."
At the beginning of Barry Wills's association with Sinclair Vehicles, he was living in the Midlands while the company was based in Motcombe Street. He did not particularly want to move house, and in any case London is hardly the place to set up an automotive company - even a fringe automotive company. There was therefore a strong case for locating the business in the Midlands where there are likeminded people, the resources of the industry, the Motor Industry Research Association (MIRA), and a geographical centre of the motorways. There was no shortage of empty offices and factories in the West Midlands, mute testimony to the contraction of the automotive, machine tool, and aircraft industries. But a radically new product needs radically new thinking; where can you find space which can be expanded as you want it, so that you do not have to think too far ahead? How about a Science Park? Warwick seemed to be the most progressive with historical links to the motor industry, and it was on that science park - with all its flexibility - that Sinclair Vehicles' head office was established in 1984.
© Rodney A
M Dale 1985. Reproduced by kind permission of the author.
Visit Rodney Dale's website at: www.fernhouse.com